Bannon’s “surrender” is intended to “understand the king”!

Spread the love

Source: what do you think of Yuanfang? Wechat ID: yfooklook

According to politico on the 8th, Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former US President trump and former political adviser, came to the Manhattan district attorney’s office at about 9 a.m. that morning and surrendered himself to the New York state prosecutor.

The word “surronder” is very skillful. Please review junior high school English with me


Vt. to cause to surrender; Give up; Surrender; Allow

Vi. surrender; yield; surrender oneself

n. Surrender; Give up; Surrender; yield

Most media in the United States, especially those controlled by the Democratic Party, basically use the word “surronder” as the title, which seems to play up an atmosphere of knowing that the king has betrayed his family and that the defeat is certain.

But did Bannon really “surender”?

Today, let’s talk about:

Bannon’s “surrender” is intended to “understand the king”

First of all, who is Bannon?

Steve Bannon, male, once served as the executive chairman of Breitbart news, a far right media, and was the chief strategic expert and senior adviser of the president of the United States.

Bannon, 68, was charged by a grand jury convened by the Manhattan district attorney for allegedly defrauding donors in the fund-raising activities for the construction of the separation wall on the US Mexico border. The charges include money laundering, conspiracy and intentional fraud.

A former “close comrade in arms” of trump, a person who knows a lot of Trump’s inside information and embezzles and accepts bribes in the “political missions” assigned by trump. An “insider” who later fell out with trump “turned himself in”.

Such propaganda, on the one hand, attacks Trump’s “political legacy” of “building the wall”, and on the other hand, exaggerates the atmosphere of alienation within Trump’s team. This political script is well written.

In particular, the title of Bannon’s “surrender” seems to express a feeling that Bannon wants to “turn back on the enemy”. But is this really the case?

According to China News Agency, New York, September 8 – Stephen Bannon, a former senior adviser to former US President trump, appeared in New York on the 8th and pleaded not guilty to the charges of money laundering and intentional fraud brought against him by a grand jury in Manhattan.

Not guilty, not guilty, not guilty

When we say “surrender”, we often say “confess guilt and surrender”, and Bannon’s attitude shows that he wants to “confess guilt and surrender”. Does Bannon have any intention of “surrender”?

However, this is not important, as long as American public opinion thinks that Bannon has “surrendered”, as long as American people think that Bannon has “turned against the water”, and as long as American voters feel that there is “really a problem” with understanding Wang

As for the facts, is it important? Even for such things that are easy to expose, the US media have to find ways to “fake” the headlines. What else can they not do or say?

On September 5, I wrote a “Biden should be ready to do it”, which said:

In combination with the FBI’s raid on the Haihu manor a few days ago, Biden has given understanding Wang a “surprise”. I don’t know if he can dig out any “surprise” after the change of secret service personnel.

It looks like:

Biden should be ready to take action.

Unexpectedly, Biden’s patience was even worse than I thought. Four days later, Bannon said in an interview with reporter Kirk on September 9, local time that on the same day that he was arraigned on criminal fraud charges, the FBI raided the homes of 35 trump allies.

Yes, if it is said that the FBI raided the Haihu manor, it can also be said that it was because of the “urgency of the situation”. In order to avoid the former president of the United States “betraying the country”, then the American people can not imagine that the FBI has really become a tool for party struggle in this large-scale search of Trump’s allies

In fact, Bannon’s home has been “searched” several times recently, and he himself has been “threatened” many times.

On September 1, while Biden delivered a speech condemning trump and Maga, armed police raided his home in Washington, but he was not at home at that time.

According to reports, the Washington police received a report that a gunman at large appeared at Bannong’s home. However, the police did not find the gunman at the scene, nor did they find anyone injured and left.

According to the daily mail, this is the second such raid on Bannon’s home. In July this year, someone reported to the police that there was a shooting incident at Bannong’s home. But when the police arrived, they quickly determined that it was a prank.

Please note that there are two keywords in these two events:

“Police search” and “shooting incident”

What does this mean?

One is to tell you that a “shooting incident” will appear in your home at any time

One is to tell you that the “police” are actually on your opponent’s side.

If you were Bannon, what would you do in the face of this strong threat of “shooting threat” and “police threat”?

Bannon said this when he was handcuffed and pressed to the trial site today:

For every conservative in the United States, this is a dying regime. What they did in the last few days will never seal my mouth. Unless they kill me first, I have not started fighting!

This is Bannon’s declaration of “surrender”.

However, Bannon must not be Biden’s ultimate goal, because: Bannon’s “surrender” is intended to “understand the king.”


I can’t help but make a comment,

The Democratic media used “surrender” to describe it, hoping to beat trump with rhythm

However, many domestic media have also used “surrender” for what? Shouldn’t we call on the US government not to engage in “political persecution” at this time?

We should deeply understand the importance and necessity of strengthening and improving international communication under the new situation, make great efforts to strengthen the building of international communication capacity, form an international voice matching China’s comprehensive national strength and international status, create a favorable external public opinion environment for China’s reform, development and stability, and make positive contributions to promoting the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *