Source: a bad potato (id:iamhtd)
Over the past few days, many people have gathered together to explain how Chinese men can expect to protect their homes and defend their country through the barbecue incident
Well, many people talked about war wolves. Let’s start with this movie.
In the first part of the war wolf, when facing foreign enemies, when at a disadvantage, soldiers do not have any hesitation and worry, and are desperate to kill the enemy. This is a true portrayal.
At the beginning of the second war wolf, he returned to reality and used extreme and artistic description.
In the face of the violent demolition team led by the evil forces headed by the “village head”, Leng Feng hesitated and struggled with ideas, and it was his comrades in arms who wanted to pull him but didn’t.
They have concerns.
But you want to say that the fighting capacity of the “village head” is stronger than that of foreign mercenaries? That’s bullshit.
Why are the “cold front” able to forge ahead when they meet the intrepid foreign mercenaries, but afraid when they meet the “village head”?
There is a good detail in the film. Leng Feng took off his hat when he beat the “village head” violently, because wearing the military cap represents the country and taking off the hat represents the individual.
In the end, Lengfeng was locked in and expelled from the army
Here, of course, it is not that Leng Feng did anything wrong, but what is the root of the problem?
The arrogance of the demolition team in the film must be due to the connivance of the local government to the underworld and evil forces, which makes them dare to trample the law without fear.
Either inaction or the umbrella of evil forces is the answer.
If we don’t face this problem, we can’t solve it if we expect to encounter a “cold front”.
Killing the enemy on the battlefield represents the country. The people’s Liberation Army is an ordinary Chinese man. In the history of the war of our army, there are few who flee or are timid. Even in the face of the world’s strongest 16 nation coalition army, they are indomitable.
At this time, soldiers have no worries. They can legally kill the enemy on the battlefield. Even if they die, their families can get honor and pension. The state will take care of them and the collective will give them courage.
But without the battlefield, the situation is very complicated.
Jackie Chan said: if you have the ability, you should go. But in reality, few people have such ability.
Even Jackie Chan has to be soft and has no such ability.
Jackie Chan was also persecuted by Hong Kong gangsters in his early days. He once revealed in an interview that he was required to pay HK $50000 protection fee before filming, and then pay HK $5000 on time every day. He had to pay another HK $30000 to dismantle the scenery, otherwise he would burn the scenery.
Jackie Chan, Chow Yun fat, Andy Lau, etc. are already the top celebrities in the Hong Kong Film and television industry. They have money, status and influence. For a long time, they are still persecuted by the underworld and are unable to protect themselves.
Hong Kong’s well-known movie stars had been coerced into making films by the underworld for a long time. Until january15,1992, they could not bear it. Jackie Chan, Tsang Chi Wai, Tsui Hark, Stephen Chow and Chow Yun fat and other more than 300 actors held a “Hong Kong wide performance industry protest against the violence in the film circle” parade to protest against the underworld power in the film circle.
Is that because Hong Kong actors are cowardly? Of course not. It is because the British Hong Kong government has no ability to govern or does not want to govern at all, resulting in a power vacuum at the bottom. It was not until the return of Hong Kong in 1997 that the film and television industry really got rid of the haze of the black and evil forces.
Even if Andy Lau recalled this time and said: I am very good in the film, but I may be killed at any time outside the camera!
So, in the same sentence, the people are the meat on the chopping board when they face organized violent black and evil forces
Among the war wolves, Leng Feng is an artistic hero who can fight a hundred;
But in the details, the village head said to Lengfeng: you are not here. You can see how I kill them when you are not here.
Back to the Tangshan barbecue shop incident, let’s not say that you can’t win the local ruffians, because they have no fear and are not afraid to kill you. Anyway, they have a lot of cases and are happy. But you don’t have the mental endurance to hurt and maim them, and you don’t dare to use any “killing moves” like them;
Let’s say again, if it wasn’t for the nationwide uproar caused by the surveillance, do you have confidence in the local public security organs and laws, and recognize that you can clean up these thugs and let them stop doing evil in the future?
Obviously, most people have no confidence, because the cake shop owner has told us that the local police can’t control them.
If you are a “cold front”, you are better, because you can leave after the fight, but if you are a local, it will be miserable, because if you can run away from the monk, you can’t run away from the temple, and you can only face endless retaliation and harassment of your family members by the black and evil forces.
Therefore, the “cold front” in the film can only hurt the killer and abolish the “village head”. Otherwise, once he leaves, the family of his comrades in arms will be humiliated by the black and evil forces.
Therefore, even if you are lucky, you are good at collecting evidence and monitoring. In the legal sense, it is the best time to act. Finally, you are recognized as a courageous person and rewarded.
In the end, it was still troublesome.
The governance ability of the local government is obviously problematic. Otherwise, such a few unscrupulous recidivists with numerous criminal records would not get together and be happy for a long time.
Then they will face the same consequences as the “cake shop owner” and be retaliated by the black and evil forces.
At the same time, the social reward for righteous acts is obviously not enough, because it is far more difficult than fighting the enemy, especially in the face of thugs.
Fighting the enemy is the responsibility and mission. It is relatively easy to produce courage under collective behavior, and the country is the strongest backing.
But like Nanjing Pangge, he stood up to the mob with more courage than the soldiers, and he was seriously injured. At that time, he entered the ICU, and now he still needs two operations and a urine bag.
It’s not enough just to be regarded as courageous
In fact, in China, there have been a lot of acts of courageous action, especially in recent years. We can often see the deeds of folk heroes pouring into newspapers and networks. Recently, the Fourth Beijing courageous action Publicity Month commended the citizens of courageous action from January 2019 to January 2021. A total of 979 people won awards.
In the face of natural disasters and force majeure, the moral quality of the Chinese people is obviously higher than that of other countries. For example, in the rainstorm in Zhengzhou, a large number of civilians selflessly and fearlessly helped others regardless of their personal safety. A total of 14 outstanding individuals and 11 outstanding groups were awarded the Title of model volunteers.
In a word, it is impossible for China to have a building collapse like that in Florida, and everyone goes to the side to “observe” heartlessly.
In the past 30 years, China’s social security has been much better than in the past. For example, in my hometown city, car bandits and road bullies were rampant in the 1980s. In the 1990s, influenced by films such as the old foggies, a large number of “ah Fei” in the school colluded with young people in society. There were a large number of “Sha Ba” and “Cai Ba” in the society who formed gangs to bully the market, and even gunfights took place in the streets.
But now this phenomenon has disappeared.
Similarly, when I first came to Guangdong in 2002, I went to Guangzhou and Huizhou more often. At that time, I believe everyone knew what the Guangzhou railway station was like. There were flying car gangs everywhere in the streets of Guangdong. The probability of being robbed of mobile phones and bags when making phone calls on the streets was too high.
But today, it is indeed very safe.
The Tangshan barbecue shop incident is unacceptable because everyone has tacitly accepted that our social security is a normal state. Unexpectedly, such things have happened, which has defeated everyone’s cognition.
People are always forgetful. Just like Tsui Hark, he said aloud:
These things can never happen again, so that our families, sisters, children, friends, female compatriots and even the people of the whole country can live in a country that guarantees the safety of life and dignity.
What Tsui Hark said is no problem. We should hope that the country will become better and better and the society will become more and more stable. However, Tsui Hark must have forgotten that he participated in the Hong Kong wide violent action parade 30 years ago and bitterly complained about the bullying of the underworld to the Hong Kong Performing arts circle.
At that time, if something like Tangshan happened in Hong Kong, it would not cause any waves, because that was the norm.
In fact, my message on the Tangshan barbecue incident is very intolerable. Many people take this opportunity to discredit and slander Chinese men and think that Chinese people are afraid to stand up.
Let’s put it this way. Any country in history that has exploded its combat effectiveness has been brave in public war and shy of private struggle.
On the contrary, the government has no governance capacity, which leads to the rampant black and evil forces, and the people protect their own security. However, such a country is a mob and a mess when it comes to the battlefield.
A typical example is Italy, where there are gangs everywhere. They fight each other to death. However, no one can fight on the battlefield. As long as the other side has combat power, they will immediately disperse like birds and beasts, run faster and collapse thousands of miles. Whether it is World War I or world War II, they are typical pig teammates, who can spit out Hitler’s blood.
In the early days of the United States, there was no order at all, gangs ran rampant, and all depended on bounty hunters and militia. Western Cowboys protected themselves and did not dare to count on the law.
So the fighting capacity was in a mess. The war of independence was fought by Britain. It all depended on France to send regular troops. Otherwise, the United States would not exist. After the founding of the people’s Republic of China, it would be no better. Canada occupied the capital and set the White House on fire
Today, various legal provisions in the United States also make it clear that the police have no obligation to protect the people, so it is all up to them to hold guns. What about Americans who hold guns? They dare not fight against tyranny or gunmen. Every time there is a large-scale shooting in the United States, thugs are killing with guns and killing for hours. No one in history dares to stand up.
Do you expect Americans to be brave enough to do what is just?
The combat effectiveness of the U.S. military is not much better. The upper limit is to fight Iraq and Afghanistan with high technology
The most typical example of “daring to fight privately and being afraid of public anger” is the American black millet, which is especially good at bullying the soft and afraid of the hard, but never organized. It is always a loose sand. It is always meat on the chopping board in front of the calculation savvy Anglo Americans.
“The people are brave in public war, afraid of private strife, and rule the country” first appeared in Sima Qian’s biography of Shang Jun, which is a record of Shang Yang’s reform.
In the early days, Shang Yang believed that the people in Qin were fierce and aggressive, but he always wanted to run away on the battlefield. His morale was low, so he severely punished those who fought privately, rewarded those who dared to fight in public and gave them honors. He established a level 20 Military Merit System, and finally created a division of tigers and wolves.
That is to say, after Qin Xiaogong adopted Shang Yang’s reform policy, all the people under his rule had the courage to fight for the country and hoped to establish brilliant military achievements. But as for the private armed struggle, they all stood still and did not dare to try.
In fact, this is not the “art of controlling the people” that everyone despises, but the truth of social governance. If there are fights everywhere in a society, it must be the rampant gangs and the low governance ability of the government.
This kind of daring to fight can definitely not be converted into combat effectiveness.
Just like before the severe crackdown in the 1990s, you can say that young people are really desperate. The people are absolutely fierce, and street fights are fierce. They have the style of Hong Kong films. But if you rely on this to defeat the United States, you can build a strong army? That’s funny.
Is it true that we use kitchen knives to cut each other with Americans in the war?
In the 1920s and 1930s, in the northeast, there were beards everywhere. It was definitely a fierce folk custom. What was the result? Was it serious to fight?
We were defeated by the Kwantung Army before we fought back. However, after our party entered the northeast of Kwantung, it eliminated banditry and treated Chen Ji. The army organized in the Northeast immediately radiated vitality and combat effectiveness. Finally, we set out from here and made unremitting efforts to liberate the whole of China.
Fighting and fighting are totally different concepts. Otherwise, Russia was the most powerful in the 1990s, because at that time, the Russian gangs ranked first in the world, making European and American gangs cry
Yes, when the Russian Mafia was the most powerful and could fight, the Russian army was beaten to the ground by Chechen rebels.
So back to the problem itself, the Tangshan barbecue shop incident, the current society, in such circumstances, in fact, is not encouraging to come forward. What’s the problem?
Just like in war wolf 2, Leng Feng was finally expelled from the military. Otherwise, it is estimated that the film will not be reviewed because everyone has to learn from others. If they see something wrong, they will think it is the “black and evil forces”. They all dare to take action. In the end, it will be a complete mess, because it is a very difficult point in the law to recognize the courage to do justice.
The problem is: since we want the people to be brave in public war and afraid of private struggle, we must have a very strong social governance ability. Otherwise, once there are black and evil forces, the people will become meat on the chopping board.
This time, it is obvious that even though it is uncertain whether there is a protective umbrella, the relevant departments are lazy and do nothing. They can’t escape the crime of watching the black and evil forces bully the people.
This is the root of the problem.
An editor in chief said that he sighed for the caution of the man at the scene. I was surprised to see this sentence.
I don’t know what an editor in chief meant. Under the circumstances, did an editor in chief want the man to go up and get beaten up, or did he think that the man could turn into spider man and subdue the other nine people present?
An editor in chief said that the people need to have the courage and impulse to go out for justice.
I very much agree with the words of an editor in chief. I also believe that with these words, an editor in chief can certainly have the courage and impulse to get rid of drug teaching materials, misappropriation of state-owned assets and corruption, rather than saying that there is a need for fuzzy areas, shouting that everyone is in danger and saying that there should be no expansion.
What is the need for justice to have the courage and impulse to go out?
That is, they dare to face up to the evil forces, thoroughly rectify the inaction of some departments, and dare to find possible protective umbrellas.
Instead of calling for the families of leading cadres to keep a low profile, they let the people present face the evil forces alone.
In my opinion, it is a super high moral level to stand up and sacrifice yourself in the face of such a state as a barbecue shop.
And the moral level is required by oneself, not others.
Therefore, I think that in the face of such a crisis situation, chief editor Hu is bound to come forward and sacrifice himself to protect the masses. However, I am afraid it is inappropriate to ask others in this way
So, I want to say to an editor in chief, I believe you are the virgin, but if you call on the people to make sacrifices, you are the virgin.
In addition, many friends leave messages backstage, thinking that if they don’t stand up at the scene, they feel very guilty and feel that their conduct is bad
Let me put it this way. In many cases, before becoming a hero, a hero doesn’t know that he can arouse righteous anger and burst out with great courage. He usually doesn’t know that he has such courage.
In fact, you weren’t there. How do you know that if you were there, you wouldn’t stand up?
Your speculation about yourself may not be right. What you think of is a possibility.
Many people say that they must stand up when they are on the scene. Are they morally superior to you?
No, this only proves that they are morally superior to you. Besides, it doesn’t mean anything.
Why don’t you know if they are not high-profile themselves, but fooling others to die?
If you don’t arrive at the scene and there is no emergency, don’t make a rash assertion that you must not be a hero.
Everyone has unlimited potential.
However, I still hope that there will be no such emergencies in the future. I hope you will be safe rather than being a hero