If the United States and Japan intervene in China to close Taiwan, China should replicate the “Tianjin model” in Ryukyu!

Spread the love

Author: Peng Shengyu

According to the report of Japan’s Jiji News Agency on the 27th, Japanese Prime Minister Mansuo Shoda said at the meeting of the Budget Committee of the House of Representatives that the Japanese government planned to purchase 400 American-made “Tomahawk” missiles.

According to media reports, the Japanese government budget for 2023 has included JPY 211.3 billion (about 10.9 billion yuan) for the purchase of “Tomahawk” missiles. The Tomahawk missile purchased this time is expected to be installed in the Self-Defense Force in 2026. Japan also considers whether to negotiate with the United States to advance the deployment time. As for the procurement quantity, the Japanese government previously refused to publish it on the grounds of “exposing the bottom card”, but some analysts believed that the maximum number of “Tomahawk” missiles purchased by Japan was about 500.

According to the three security policy documents issued by Japan at the end of last year, Japan’s defense concept has changed significantly, emphasizing the “counterattack capability”. The Japanese government plans to purchase the “Tomahawk” cruise missiles from the United States at one time, which also shows that it is eager to acquire the counterattack capability to destroy the missile bases within the territory of other countries with this equipment.

All kinds of signs during this period show that Japan is preparing for all kinds of war to cooperate with the United States to fully intervene in China’s reunification!

How should China respond? The author believes that if the United States and Japan intervene in China’s Taiwan withdrawal, China should replicate the “Tianjin model” in Ryukyu

We all know that the United States wants to turn Taiwan into a scorched earth, and let the Chinese people on both sides of the mainland and Taiwan island kill each other on China’s own territory. The United States wants to see the last Taiwanese fight, and even Biden blurted out how tragic the “destroy Taiwan” plan is!

Should the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Straits be pawned by the United States and Japan to fight against each other in their own land, causing serious death and injury to their own people? Absolutely not. What should we do?

We should choose the battlefield on the territory occupied by the enemy! If Japan is willing to be the “pawn” of the United States to actively intervene in China’s withdrawal from Taiwan, China should choose Okinawa for the war against Japan and the United States, and Ryukyu for the war of liberation. During the war of liberation, we attacked Tianjin to peacefully liberate Peiping. Now, if we fight Ryukyu as Tianjin, after Ryukyu defeated the U.S. and Japanese troops in Okinawa, we may also be able to achieve Taiwan’s reunification at a lower cost and even succeed in forcing Taiwan to be unified during the war.

Moreover, we must be clear: the idea of taking Ryukyu as Tianjin is worth considering. If we fight Ryukyu well, we may not need to fight this war in Taiwan. After Ryukyu is won (the United States and Japan are defeated here), we can use the island chain to comprehensively blockade Taiwan to force reunification. The war of closing Taiwan is essentially a fight between Japan and the United States. They want to turn Baodao into Jiaodao, but we don’t. It is clear that the essence is that we fight with Japan and the United States. It is better for Japan and the United States to open fire to stop us from closing Taiwan. We immediately take the sword to the side and take Ryukyu to open the sword to create conditions, so that the war of closing Taiwan will evolve into the Peiping mode. This idea is worth considering. It should be the core idea to deal with the United States and Japan, and it is also the greatest possibility to follow the Tianjin Peiping model again. At the same time, such a model of taking Ryukyu as Tianjin and then forcing Taiwan to be unified can enable us to solve a series of major strategic objectives such as Taiwan’s reunification, the United States containment, the Japanese threat, and the island chain siege in a war. We should not make the mistake of often fighting in the future. If we have the ability and determination, we should solve most of the challenges in one war.

Then take this opportunity to propose the following ideas for the reunification of the motherland:

1? Prepare for the large-scale naval war between China and the United States, and prepare for the freezing and confiscation of overseas assets

After we decide to start the reunification process, if we are not sure whether the United States and Japan will intervene, we may try to try to reunify Taiwan by feigning. If the United States and Japan dare not intervene and do not actively attack us, we can concentrate on Taiwan. If the United States and Japan actively attack our Taiwan army by feigning and formally sending troops to intervene in China’s Taiwan withdrawal, China can turn the direction, take Ryukyu first, attack Ryukyu as Tianjin first, and Taiwan can be released and then reunited. After Ryukyu defeated Japan or the United States and Japan, it was not late to accept Taiwan.

After the intervention of the United States and Japan, there must be a big sea war with the United States and Japan. It is very necessary for China to think about the possibility of a Sino-US war, especially the possibility of a large-scale naval war between China and the United States, and to guard against the possibility of the main force of the Chinese navy being attacked by the United States. We cannot see the failure of a sea war ruin the future of China’s rise and rejuvenation and the reunification of the motherland.

At the same time, we should be highly vigilant: we cannot completely ignore the possibility that the United States will use the direct war between China and the United States to contain China and seek to defeat China. The Sino-Japanese Jiawu Naval War, the Japan-Russia Naval War against Malaysia, and the Japan-US Pacific Naval War have a long history. If the United States seeks to destroy the main force of the Chinese navy with the intention of using a naval war, and let China lose its naval capability to recover Taiwan, how should China face it?

Be lenient in anticipating the enemy and strict in anticipating yourself. We can’t think that the United States can’t do this or that. Our international strategic community should think about how to strangle China as Americans do, and then we can really figure out what the Americans might do.

China should prepare for a large-scale naval war against the United States!

We should highly guard against the internal elites of China controlled by the West threatening to influence China’s decision-making and betray China’s decision-making intelligence

A word for Chinese people who have a lot of wealth abroad: before Pelosi came to Taiwan, Switzerland suddenly shouted, “If China acts recklessly, freezing Chinese assets in Switzerland will only be more severe than Russia”, which is an obvious warning of the United States arrangement. It shows that the Chinese elite level does not exclude the existence of a large number of assets in Switzerland, and the United States wants to let these Chinese elites control China’s decision-making through the deterrence of their assets. At this point, we must recognize that we cannot be influenced by the Chinese people who have assets overseas at a critical time to influence our decisions and China’s national interests. It should also clearly warn the Chinese people who have assets in the West in Japan and Australia in Switzerland that if you have assets, you should transfer them immediately, or else you will be in trouble and no one can help you!

2? To learn from Russia’s lessons, we should do things in reverse order between the United States and Russia: first confiscate its assets by sanctions against the United States, and then take action against Taiwan

If we can’t avoid it, we should do our best.

First, sanctions should be imposed on the United States to confiscate its assets, and then actions should be taken against Taiwan.

Before Russia moved Ukraine, it should take the initiative to confiscate Western assets under the condition that its own assets have been transferred, and then start a war in Ukraine.

Based on the fact that the United States and Europe also have a large amount of assets in China, it is very worthwhile to take the West by surprise and confiscate the assets of the other side before fighting. Anyone who, like Russia, starts to fight first and then is confiscated by others to make a lot of money is extremely stupid.

As long as China has made up its mind, it should take the initiative in everything and not react passively. The United States should take the initiative to confiscate assets and block sanctions, and then close the Taiwan Strait. The reverse order may make it difficult for Europe to intervene. In this way, the United States combined with the West to block and sanction China, and the Cold War only occurred between China and the United States.

You can think that China is the first to take the lead, sanctions the United States first, and then close the Taiwan Strait. The possible situation is completely different from the passive closing of the Taiwan Strait, and then the active joint sanctions against China. We take the initiative to ban the transfer of American assets in China on the premise that we are prepared, that is, on the ground that the United States has crossed the red line through the Taiwan Policy Law. After we move, the mutual blockade and sanctions between China and the United States can be carried out for a period of time, and then China will take over the Taiwan Strait. Such a procedure may completely disrupt the United States’ desire to unite with the West to sanction China and make it difficult for Europe and many countries to make up their minds to participate in the Cold War against China.

3? In the future, the procedure of Taiwan withdrawal should consider: first try low-cost Taiwan withdrawal, and then large-scale military reunification

We should seriously consider and operate the coup to seize power. Is there only Wu Tong or He Tong from the mainland to unify Taiwan? The author believes that there is a third way, which is neither simple Wutong nor simple Hetong. The third way is to use Taiwan soldiers to recover Taiwan. The risks and sacrifices of this model are far better than the military unification of Taiwan by the mainland. The possibility cannot be ruled out, because once the military is unified, Taiwan soldiers will be the first victims of “Taiwan independence”.

We should seriously operate the third way to unify Taiwan – the military coup of Taiwan and the military reunification of the mainland. It is not necessary to be patriotic to participate in the coup and seize power. For most Taiwanese soldiers who weigh the pros and cons, “there must be brave men under heavy rewards”.

It should be estimated that many Taiwanese soldiers can accept that Taiwan is a province of China in the face of the pressure of the imminent war. The military uprising and coup in Taiwan Province led to the reunification, which is essentially consistent with the Fuzuoyi uprising in Beijing in 1949, and is based on the national interests. China’s policy makers should give strategic consideration to plotting against the “gun barrel” of the Taiwan army. The reasonable innovation of the Peiping model can be used to unify Taiwan, which needs the wisdom of both sides of the Taiwan Strait to promote.

We can talk seriously with the relevant forces in the island. As long as there are forces to seize power in a coup, China will support them to overthrow the “Taiwan independence” regime and establish a patriotic local regime to manage Taiwan. China can encourage any team that dares to seize power in a coup. Whoever succeeds in seizing power first will be supported by China and will be regarded as a national hero. In order to cooperate with the seizure of power, China can list the core elements of “Taiwan independence”, encourage all forces and can use any means to eliminate the criminals on the “Taiwan independence” list, so as to deter any politician in Taiwan from “Taiwan independence”, embracing the United States and allowing the United States to take advantage of it. In short, everything revolves around eliminating the “Taiwan independence” regime and seizing the Taiwan regime.

How to distinguish “Taiwan independence” from the people of Taiwan requires a specific demarcation line. Through the solemn declaration of the state, the “Taiwan independence” regime was declared illegal and resolutely banned; The best distinction is to treat the core elements of “Taiwan independence” as criminals who split the country and treat them as terrorist leaders.

National justice is the greatest moral, and the best way to achieve results is the best way. Other words are pedantic. In the matter of seizing Taiwan’s political power, any method can be tried several times.

4? Make it difficult for Europe to participate in the comprehensive blockade sanctions against China required by the United States

The root of America’s confidence in the Cold War against China is to unite the allies of the whole western world. We should realize that the most important purpose of the United States to stimulate China to close Taiwan is to attract the whole western world to impose sanctions on China. If the United States only chooses to fight against China and fight a cold war between the two countries, it is not necessary for the United States to stimulate China to end Taiwan.

We should see clearly that China’s response to sanctions imposed by the United States alone is not too big a problem. In other words, there is no good score between China and the United States. China is not likely to lose. If it cannot lead the major countries of the EU to impose sanctions on China together, the United States is likely to give up the cold war against China because of its lack of confidence in winning. So the greatest confidence of the United States in the Cold War with China is to unite the whole West and Europe. Because of this, we should innovate the model so that Europe has reason not to participate in the sanctions against China.

We all know that Europe is hurt in participating in the comprehensive blockade and sanctions against Russia, and there is a large force in Europe that is unwilling to cooperate with the United States to suppress and contain China. But in Europe, there are big hooligans living in their own homes. If they don’t obey, they will be punished. Then how to make Europe have enough and sufficient reasons not to listen to Americanized sanctions against China. Personally, if China takes the initiative to launch sanctions against the United States, the two sides will block sanctions against each other for a period of time. Because there is no war in this process, it will be difficult for Europe to listen to the United States and participate in the comprehensive blockade sanctions against China at the expense of its own interests. That is to say, the blockade and sanctions between China and the United States took place first, which made the United States lose the reason and excuse for trying to win over the Western blockade and sanctions against China on the basis of China’s Taiwan War. Europe may easily fail to cooperate with the United States blockade and sanctions against China, and avoid the stupid thing of “hurting the enemy 800 and damaging 1000”. This is what I called for above. When the Americans stimulate China to close Taiwan, we should first comprehensively sanction the United States on the basis of the other side’s major actions to stimulate China (such as the Taiwan Policy Law), then try to close Taiwan at a low cost, and finally consider large-scale military reunification. In this order, it will be difficult for the United States to lead the West to comprehensively block sanctions against China on the basis of war.

5? Build up confidence in the Sino-US Cold War

Even in the face of the impact of the epidemic, China’s manufacturing industry is still strong at present. It is suggested that those who have insufficient confidence in China can look at this set of data:

Among the 22 global manufacturing sectors monitored by the United Nations, China’s output share in 16 sectors ranks first in the world. In light industries such as clothing and textile, general industries such as basic metals, and high-end industries such as computers and transportation equipment, China has occupied a dominant position. It is difficult to find an industry in which China’s global share is less than 20%, and its share in electrical equipment, base metal and computer industries is more than 40%; In the textile, clothing and leather industries, more than 50%.

In other words, if the global manufacturing industry is compared to the Olympic Games, China can win gold or silver medals in every event. Previously, in 2000, China ranked first in only three categories: tobacco, textiles and leather.

The core of the cold war between the two countries is the manufacturing industry, not some cutting-edge technology. It is not cutting-edge technology that solves people’s lives. Our ability to safeguard people’s lives is far better than that of the United States. We can be inferior to each other in some fields, and we do not seek to catch up with each other in the fields where the United States leads in the short term. Our more important thing is to protect the lives of the people, and our ability to protect the lives of the people is far better than that of the United States.

According to the announcement of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology in March 2021, China’s industrial added value increased from 23.5 trillion to 31.3 trillion, becoming the world’s largest manufacturing country for 11 consecutive years. The proportion of manufacturing industry to the world’s manufacturing industry is close to 30%.

According to the data released by the National Bureau of Statistics, China’s GDP in 2021 exceeded 114 trillion yuan, and the manufacturing industry contributed 3137.97 billion yuan, accounting for 27.44%. In dollar terms, China’s GDP has reached 17.73 trillion, and its manufacturing industry is about 4.864 trillion – both in scale and proportion, which is higher than that of the United States. In 2021, the GDP generated by the US manufacturing industry rose to US $2563.3 billion (about US $2.563 trillion), accounting for 11.15% of the US economy.

China is the core exporter of goods to the United States. The United States only owns US dollars, and we only have usable goods. As long as the United States launches a cold war against China, it is in essence that we sanction the United States, not the United States. Therefore, the cold war between China and the United States will not collapse. On the contrary, the showdown between China and the United States in the Cold War may even lead to China’s acceleration in surpassing the United States.

6? China and Russia sincerely cooperate to unite Asia, Africa, Latin America and Europe, unite the world’s major supply and population countries, and isolate the United States

The United States intends to carry out a “packaged cold war” against China and Russia. If the Great Cold War in the East and the West starts, we should seriously consider the camp for camp and alliance for alliance. To fight alone against the West will be defeated by the West one by one. China and Russia should fully form a military, political and economic alliance. If the United States packages the Cold War with China and Russia, China and Russia should lead and unite many countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America to form an alliance, and can form a group larger than NATO.

It is very worthwhile to consider the establishment of a new world alliance beyond NATO. If the new global alliance led by China and Russia can bring dozens or even hundreds of Asian, African and Latin American countries, our strength will surpass that of the West and NATO. This can also make the other side compromise and give up confrontation.

China and Russia need to strongly unite the third world. Now the West is united to speak out, while the Third World is fragmented, and China and Russia need to take the lead in unity. The major, small and medium-sized countries in the world are now afraid to offend the United States because there is no such alliance and no China and Russia to support them with the alliance. As long as the Sino-Russian alliance is established, many small and medium-sized countries oppressed by the United States will dare to resist the United States and stand up.

China has Russia’s energy support, and its energy supply is not a big problem. In addition, China should maintain good relations with Asia, Africa and Latin America. The key point is to close the relationship with the major global supply countries. If we can unite the major global supply countries on all continents and collectively ban sales to the United States, then we can play a very good role in sanctions against the United States. The United States only has dollars. If it can’t buy goods from the major supply countries in the world, dollars are waste paper.

China and Russia should also work closely, each with its own division of labor, and seriously consider the strategy of “dragging the United States, tiring the United States and collapsing the United States”.

The overall idea is to stimulate the desire and idea of the United States to compete, and attract the United States to invest huge energy and resources to maintain various positions, face and interests. Let the United States focus as much resources and human, material and financial resources as possible on the world and China and Russia for the top position, let the United States military burden the country, fight against the burden of the country, let the United States have no time to take care of its own people’s livelihood and economy, and at the same time, guide and gather the important contradictions in the United States reasonably. When the domestic contradictions can not be reconciled, use the opportunity to ignite and ignite the major contradictions in the United States, and let the United States collapse from within.

7? The United States is trying to isolate China and Russia from enjoying the “cake” of the world. China and Russia should dare to turn the table over and let the “cake” of the world disappear

If China and Russia decouple from the United States and Europe, the focus of the two sides may be on India and other third world countries with large populations and resources, with a total population of 1 billion in the United States and Europe. If the United States and Europe fail to win over the large population and resource countries, they will also find their own way. If China and Russia fail to win over and are sure to be won over by the United States and Europe, China and Russia can actually take a path of destruction, and let the large market and resource countries that they cannot win over not get the other side. Such an outcome may be that the decline of the United States and Europe accelerates faster than that of China and Russia.

The United States wants to kick China out of the current world economic and trade system. If there is a showdown, China cannot allow the United States to enjoy the normal world economic and trade system. The cake we can’t eat can’t make Americans eat well. China and Russia should also consider smashing the cake to make the world no longer continue the normal economic and trade system. The end may be to let the United States lift the stone and smash itself to decline faster. The result of losing the normal world economic and trade system may be more unbearable to the United States than to us.

The establishment of the economic size of the United States today depends much more on the world than on China. As before, everyone had cake to eat, now the other party didn’t want us to eat, so we simply smashed the cake so that the other party didn’t have to eat. No matter who can bear the ending without cake. It is easy to destroy the world economic and trade system. If the “choke point” of individual maritime transport is paralyzed, the normal economic and trade logistics in the world can be suspended.

The West knows that a comprehensive showdown between China and the United States is inevitable. It is not only the United States that wants to block China, but also China that wants to unify. After the showdown between China and the United States, the development outcome of China and the United States is actually very variable. I personally believe that both China and the United States will fall into a sharp recession as a result, and there is a possibility that China will catch up with the United States more quickly after the showdown. It doesn’t happen now, and no one can say the end.

If China really wants to catch up with the United States and surpass the United States to pull the United States down from the world’s top power, perhaps the showdown is the fastest way. In fact, the United States is no longer very useful to China, and what we want to learn can’t be learned. China’s market dependence on the United States is less than that of the United States. After the showdown between China and the United States, and after the world’s normal economic and trade system was broken, I personally felt that the economic volume of the United States would shrink far more than that of China. At present, the United States is far more dependent on globalization than China. The biggest drawback of the United States economy is that it is too dependent on the world and has poor self-reliance ability. At the same time, its own population is too small to digest and support the advanced industries of the United States. If the United States really wants to fight with China, it may accelerate China to become the world leader. For China, now it is the second, and if it loses, it should still be the second; But if the United States loses, it will directly put China in the top position in the world. This may be the end of a war between China and the United States. Perhaps China is expecting the United States to intervene in China. At present, China is surrounded by the sphere of influence of the United States. There is no one in China. If we really fight, China will only gain and the United States will only lose. This is a high probability.

At that time, Brzezinski was most worried about Eurasia becoming the world island and the United States becoming the outside world. The showdown between China, the United States and Russia may really paralyze the idea of China and Russia to isolate the United States from North America and make Asia, Europe and Africa a world island.

????????????????????????????????

According to the latest report of the Wall Street Journal on May 23, 2022, President Biden said that the United States would defend Taiwan from Chinese aggression militarily. On February 25, 2023, Antony Blinken publicly declared that Taiwan was not an internal affair of China.

The United States describes China’s reunification as China’s invasion of Taiwan and its military defense of Taiwan directly announced to the outside world? It shows that the United States has a new way of thinking about the use of Taiwan.

If China and the United States really fight in Taiwan, it may be a great benefit to China. If the United States intervenes in the war of China’s reunification, I personally believe that this war will directly establish China’s new world leader position.

China’s defeat of the United States in the Taiwan War will directly establish China’s new leading position in the world.

The report released by the Pacific Forum, an American think-tank, in late February 2023 pointed out that whether the United States intervened in the Taiwan Strait conflict or not, the consequences of Chinese Mainland’s attack on Taiwan would be earth shaking, and it could once and for all surpass the strength and influence of the United States in the Indo Pacific region, and the era of “China governing the world” would come

Therefore, if the United States dares to intervene in China’s reunification, China will certainly pay all the costs, while the United States cannot have China’s great determination to fight and the will to pay all the costs. In this way, we will fight with all our strength and the other side will fight at leisure, which will be of great benefit to China. After defeating the United States in this war, China will therefore directly establish China’s new leading position in the world, It will greatly accelerate China’s recognition as a superpower beyond the United States.

War, especially the war between the boss and the second, is sometimes the best way to directly establish who is the new boss in the world.

If there is no such direct war between each other, on the contrary, it will be difficult for the next few decades to contain all kinds of things and not give up killing them

Therefore, the United States’ intervention in Taiwan may be good for China. This kind of war in which the United States intervenes and does not put all its efforts into it (the cost of the big battle with China to defend Taiwan is totally worthless, and it is certain that it will not do all its best to pay all the costs as China does) is the best opportunity for China to defeat the United States’ global power and establish its global position beyond the United States at one stroke.

After all, since reunification is a war, China should simply achieve reunification on the one hand, and defeat the United States to establish a new and old global pattern.

9? The mutual blockade and sanctions between China and the United States triggered by China’s withdrawal from Taiwan will greatly promote the decline of the United States and may speed up China’s surpassing the United States. It will also greatly correct and correct China’s current unhealthy export-oriented economic model, which is too pursuing and dependent on exports. The territory will be taken back forever, and the temporary economic contraction is temporary, just like the stock curve.

If China takes Taiwan, its economy will be delayed for a while, which is actually the price it can pay. The so-called price of being punished by the Western collective is not so pessimistic. China cannot leave export is a false proposition. China should not pursue export too much. The unification of the country is the unification, the territory is taken back, and it is not your own if you don’t come back. Like the stock market, the economy fell and rose at the same time, and the contraction at the same time was of little significance. The territory will be taken back forever, and the temporary economic contraction is temporary, just like the stock curve. The economic model of the export trade of working for people has changed since it is unified. There is nothing bad about it.

The best way to accelerate the decline of the United States is to make the major large enterprises of the United States small and die. The situation that the United States launched the Cold War against China, first of all, is that all American enterprises in China will be confiscated of their assets, while completely losing the Chinese market. This scene will knock down a large number of major American enterprise groups. If they fall, they will fall a large part of the upstream and downstream of the American industrial chain, which will be the best result of accelerating the decline of the United States. Because 80% of the income of large Chinese enterprises is in China, and the other 20% is in foreign countries, of which the proportion of the United States and Europe is also small, so the major enterprises in China will be affected very little. By analyzing the situation of more than one hundred world top 500 companies in China and the United States, I feel that the United States showdown the Cold War against China will help China to accelerate the decline of the United States. If we want to fight, China must be prepared, and we must not show mercy to a large number of American enterprises. Only by being ruthless, can we collapse the United States Empire State Building and let the United States dig its own grave. If it is not cruel enough, it will not have this effect. We just want to see a large number of American enterprises collapse in an instant, rapidly shrink and accelerate their decline. If the cold war cannot be avoided, China should seize the opportunity to directly overturn the United States.

As long as China is determined, it should take the initiative to fight everything. It can take the initiative to fight the cold war against the United States first, and then close the Taiwan Strait. The reverse order may make it difficult for Europe to intervene. In this way, the United States and the West will join in the blockade and sanctions against China, and the cold war will only happen between China and the United States.

As long as the country has made up its mind, it should take the initiative to fight everything, and should not react passively. It should take the initiative to confiscate assets and block sanctions against the United States. If China feels that the Cold War between China and the United States is inevitable (the United States takes the initiative to showdown with China or China is determined to close the Taiwan Strait), China will take the initiative to find an excuse to take the lead in comprehensively blockade and sanctions against the United States, confiscate all U.S. assets in China, and first fight a separate cold war of mutual blockade and sanctions between China and the United States, then after the Cold War, it may be difficult for the United States to lead the West to join the Cold War against China, It may just be the Cold War between China and the United States confiscating sanctions against each other.

10? If Japan intervenes in China to close Taiwan, China should repeat the “Tianjin model” in Ryukyu

If Japan is willing to be the “pawn” of the United States to actively intervene in China’s withdrawal from Taiwan, China should choose Okinawa for the war against Japan and the United States, and Ryukyu for the war of liberation. During the war of liberation, we attacked Tianjin to peacefully liberate Peiping. Now, if we fight Ryukyu as Tianjin, after Ryukyu defeated the U.S. and Japanese troops in Okinawa, we may also be able to achieve Taiwan’s reunification at a lower cost and even succeed in forcing Taiwan to be unified during the war.

They want to turn Baodao into Jiaodao, but we can’t be fooled. We should set the battlefield in Okinawa after defeating the United States and Japan in Ryukyu, and then close the stage.

??

In addition, the United States and Japan are involved in China’s withdrawal of Taiwan, and China cannot only withdraw Taiwan. To recover Ryukyu together, we cannot only win Taiwan at the cost of being completely blocked by the West.

The Ryukyu Islands (in English:. Historically, the Ryukyu Islands have long belonged to China’s sphere of influence. It is about 700 kilometers away from Shanghai, Ningbo and Wenzhou along the coast of China. Before 1871, there was the Ryukyu State. The territory of the Ryukyu State starts from the Great Island of Amami in the north, ends at Xijie Island in the east, ends at Bozhaojian Island in the south, and ends at Naguo Island in the west. It is under the jurisdiction of Japan, the defeated country in World War II, but the administrative power in some areas is still exercised by the United States. About 70% of the U.S. military bases in Japan are concentrated in Ryukyu.

It goes without saying that Ryukyu’s strategic position is clear to all. Ryukyu has also been China’s territory since ancient times.

China only accepts Taiwan, and Japan and the United States will not be too afraid to intervene. Japan and the United States are afraid of moving Ryukyu. China’s recovery of Ryukyu is also a powerful symbol of China’s defeat of the United States in the world.

If Taiwan and Ryukyu can come back at one time, China will be greatly affected by the whole western blockade and sanctions, and it is also worth it. It is not important that GDP catch up with the United States sooner or later. Don’t worry that China’s reunification will affect GDP growth and GDP first. We should not pursue to catch up with the United States in terms of GDP. It is difficult to judge whether we can catch up with the United States itself (we can’t just look at GDP). What about China’s GDP at the end of the Qing Dynasty, which is one third of the world’s largest global GDP?

If the United States and Japan intervene in China to close Taiwan, China should repeat the “Tianjin model” in Ryukyu.

The model of taking Ryukyu as Tianjin and then forcing Taiwan to be unified can enable us to solve a series of major strategic objectives such as Taiwan’s reunification, the United States containment, the threat of Japan, and the siege of the island chain in a war. If we have the ability and determination, we should solve most of the challenges in a war.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *