This plot in the United States has gone bankrupt, and now it is becoming angry!

Spread the love

This article is reproduced by Niu Danqin (id:bullpiano) with authorization. Author: Niu Danqin


American comics, it’s interesting to see


The American conspiracy has gone bankrupt and is now becoming angry.

What conspiracy?

He hoped to manipulate the visit of the United Nations High Commissioner for human rights Bachelet to China and launch an attack on China on the Xinjiang issue.

The struggle is still fierce.

At the UN Security Council on June 2, Dai Bing, Deputy Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations, said in response to the unreasonable accusations of the United States and Britain that there is a Western proverb that if you tell a lie, you will create another 100 lies to cover it up. The so-called “genocide” and “forced labor” in Xinjiang are outright “century lies”

It is indeed a “century lie”, but some people have ulterior motives.

Dai Bing went on to point out that the United States and Britain were afraid that their fabricated lies about “genocide” and “forced labor” in Xinjiang would be seen through by the international community, so they would not hesitate to fabricate more lies to discredit China and mislead the international community.

The recent struggle revolved around Bachelet’s visit to China, with several interesting details.

Detail 1: earlier, China was not cooperating in the attack.

The United States and other countries have always attacked China and refused to allow the United Nations High Commissioner for human rights to visit China, thereby hinting at China’s hidden secrets.

What should I do? In fact, China’s response is very simple. We should agree on an appropriate time and let the High Commissioner for human rights come and have a look.

After all, seeing is better than hearing.

But the United States has always been good at this smear technique. I remember at the beginning of the epidemic, on the issue of virus tracing, the United States also accused China of preventing the WHO expert group from visiting China. China was tit for tat and asked the expert group to visit China. The lie was defeated.

Detail 2: before leaving, it was a mistake to accuse Bachelet of visiting China.

Seeing that China did not act in accordance with the American script, he welcomed Bachelet to visit China. The United States quickly changed its attitude. Before Bachelet’s trip, it accused her of being wrong and the trip would be controlled by China.

At first, some so-called professional human rights defenders in Xinjiang had been calling for the visit of the United Nations High Commissioner for human rights to China for months. They seem to think that this will never happen. But when Bachelet really went to China, they began to clamor that this was a mistake and should not go.

So foreign ministry spokesman zhaolijian publicly refuted that the activities of Bachelet’s High Commissioner in China were arranged according to his wishes and through full consultation between the two sides. At the press conference, High Commissioner Bachelet also said that during his visit to China, he had extensive exchanges without supervision. How to limit? How to manipulate?

The answer is obvious. In zhaolijian’s words: in fact, it is precisely the US side that really wants to manipulate this visit.

Detail 3: after the trip, Bachelet was asked to resign.

During this high-profile visit to China, Bachelet went to Guangzhou and Xinjiang to see and communicate all the way.

According to the introduction of Vice Foreign Minister mazhaoxu, during his stay in Xinjiang, China gave Bachelet a comprehensive introduction to Xinjiang’s measures and achievements in anti-terrorism and de extremism, economic and social development, ethnic religion, labor rights protection, etc. Bachelet made field visits in Kashgar and Urumqi, and held discussions and exchanges with people from all walks of life such as ethnic minorities, experts and scholars

His final conclusion: with the joint efforts of both sides, the visit has achieved positive and pragmatic results.

It is obvious that some people in the West cannot accept the fact that the US side finally “achieved positive and pragmatic results” in an attempt to accuse China.

Although the U.S. official is still the same old story, some so-called “human rights organizations” and personages manipulated by the U.S. side have recently repeatedly launched sieges on Bachelet and even asked her to resign.

Alas, just because the United States was not satisfied, the United States directly asked the United Nations High Commissioner for human rights to leave.

Is it a little angry?



Why is that?

I don’t like conspiracy theory, but when it comes to the Xinjiang issue, the United States launched a series of attacks and smear campaigns by taking advantage of Bachelet’s visit to China. We can’t help but question the intentions of some people in the West.

Does the United States really care about human rights in Xinjiang?

You know, in the past 20 years, the United States has had fierce conflicts with many Islamic countries, such as military invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, severe sanctions against Iran and Syria, how many tragedies have been caused, and how many civilians have been “killed by mistake” by the U.S. military. Photos and videos are proof that the United States cannot deny it. Where are human rights?

However, the United States does not care about Afghanistan and Iraq, but especially about China’s Xinjiang. In the words of some friends, this is just a way to discredit China’s international reputation, provoke civil strife in China, and combat the important role of Xinjiang in the “the Belt and Road”, etc.

Interestingly, the Middle East countries that should have the most attitude have very different views from the West. For example, at the beginning of this year, Saudi foreign minister Faisal visited China. He said in the presence of Wangyi that Saudi Arabia firmly supports China’s legitimate positions on issues related to Xinjiang and human rights. Wangyi also said that Saudi Arabia, as an important Islamic country, speaks out on issues related to Xinjiang and opposes interference in China’s internal affairs. China highly appreciates it.

This is the attitude of the countries in the Middle East. I wonder if the United States has seen it. Of course, even if you see it, you just don’t see it. In the eyes of these people, anti-terrorism in the west is anti-terrorism, and anti-terrorism in China is a human rights issue.

Double labels make people speechless. Moreover, the accusations of the so-called “genocide” in the West are absurd.

Huachunying recently posted a digital comparison chart on Twitter:

Number of American Indians:

In the 16th century (1500s), 5million;

20th century (1900s), 2


Uighur population in China:

In 1950s (1950s), 3.6 million;

In the 1920s (2020s), there were 11.6 million.

Who is “genocide” is obvious.


However, the United States has also continued to play a role. Recently, it has claimed to completely ban Xinjiang products on the grounds of so-called “forced labor”; At the same time, all kinds of pressure on Bachelet, now even more to the point of Bachelet’s resignation.

Finally, what do you think?

Let’s go for three.

First, Bachelet is also under great pressure.

As a senior politician, Bachelet was the president of Chile. Her work in the post of the High Commissioner for human rights is also commendable. But even with such qualifications, after all, she is not a Western politician. It is conceivable that she is constrained.

In particular, this trip to Xinjiang, the various defamation and attacks of the United States and the West must also make her feel unprecedented pressure.

It is not easy to resist pressure and stick to conscience in this world.

Second, China does have a set of diplomacy.

The struggle is still wonderful.

The United States believes that China dares not allow the High Commissioner for human rights to visit China, so it discredits all kinds of people. However, China assesses the situation by inviting Bachelet to come to China and letting her see what she wants to see.

Wangyi personally greeted her in Guangzhou, and the supreme leader also held a video meeting. Frankly speaking, these are some exceptional diplomatic moves, which also highlight the importance China attaches to Bachelet’s visit to China. We also hope that she is a rational and fair person and can say a few words of justice.

Of course, the struggle continues. For the United States, if Bachelet is not allowed to visit China, the United States can attack; Let Bachelet come to China, and the United States can attack; No matter what Bachelet said, the United States can attack

Anyway, it’s an attack. You can never wake a person who pretends to sleep.


Third, it is not polite to come but not to go.

I always feel that it is necessary to clarify and be frank in dealing with such defamation and attacks. At the same time, it is also necessary to come and not to be rude.

During Bachelet’s visit to China, another mass shooting incident occurred in the United States. Poor 19 primary school students died at gunpoint. Even Biden lamented that this was a massacre.

There are so many massacres in the United States every year. What is this not a violation of human rights? What has the US government done? Bachelet, should we go to America.

In addition, there are endless cases of racial discrimination. Black people are so angry that “I can’t breathe”, and Chinese people also encounter various attacks. Should the High Commissioner for human rights investigate such blatant discrimination.

In this world, the protection of human rights is not the best, only better. All mankind should refuel.

On the issue of human rights, there is no perfect “Republic” and there is no need for “teachers” who dictate to other countries. Alas, many times, it is an indisputable fact that the ideal country is not ideal. The teacher’s house is full of chicken feathers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *