Original: Housha Source WeChat official account: Housha has been authorized to reprint
On the 29th, the BBC was criticized by Zhao Lijian, spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China. This old ballad stick unexpectedly came to China to touch porcelain.
On the evening of the 27th, a BBC reporter in Shanghai gathered at a certain intersection. The police advised these people to leave, but the reporter refused to leave and did not identify himself to the police. The police then forcibly took him away and asked him to leave on his own after carrying out the necessary identity verification and legal notification.
What was the mission of the BBC reporter who did not want to disclose his identity that night? What was Ann’s heart? I’m afraid it and its boss know best.
??????????????????BBC??????????????????????
??
????????????????????????BBC????????????????“?????”??????????????????
Therefore, Zhao Lijian came forward to respond with a positive view.
In terms of rumor making, the BBC has always been a professional. Don’t underestimate the power of BBC. Its destructive power is greater than that of two British aircraft carriers. From the media perspective, the BBC is a super “aircraft carrier” in the global public opinion field.
How powerful is the BBC? More people were killed by its mouth guns than by bombers. We cannot help but guard against such “special soldiers” journalists.
Far from it, we all know the “White Helmet” organization. It is part of the Western war machine and has been active in Syria from 2013 to 2018. It has become the only “credible source” for western people to obtain information about the Syrian war.
However, a “white helmet” organization alone, no matter how many “tragedies” it has photographed, would not be known to the western people without a world-class communication platform.
The BBC is the most important communication platform of “White Helmet”, both of which are controlled by the UK.
The shooting material of “White Helmet” has become a news report after being processed by BBC.
But is this kind of news still news? Of course not. It is a public opinion shell launched by the United States and Britain.
When Western people are still drinking coffee and eating breakfast, their brains have been bombed by the BBC.
In 2018, the situation of the Syrian war was basically clear. When the Assad regime gained a firm foothold, the “white helmet” gradually disappeared, and the Syrian “independent journalists” who received US dollar subsidies every day also disappeared.
Then, the British leader of the “White Helmet” was “jumped off a building to commit suicide” in Türkiye. So far, the BBC’s combat mission in Syria has basically ended, and the popularity of reporting on the country has rapidly dropped to the freezing point.
From the whole process of the Syrian civil war and the “Arab Spring”, we can see that the BBC has played a crucial role in a series of links such as topic making, public opinion fermenting, emotional incitement, street riots, civil war breaking out, and accusations against Syria’s chemical weapons.
The BBC closely follows the political needs of the United States and Britain in every link, and is no different from the military’s acceptance of combat instructions. Ironically, many people still think that BBC is an independent media.
Apart from Syria, the BBC is not idle in other parts of the world.
The BBC’s “World Channel” radio program in Hong Kong, China, has been constantly hyping topics since 2010, tearing apart the emotional connection between the mainland and Hong Kong, and even such small things as children’s defecation should be put on the agenda.
In 2014, the BBC devoted all its efforts to the “Occupy Middle” event, and talked about the art of protest; It will beautify the black storm elements. The BBC continued to hype and incite more people to participate until 2015.
In 2019, the BBC will be full of firepower in Hong Kong, regardless of financial, human and material resources, in order to reverse the black and white of Hong Kong.
The BBC openly gave false testimony to those gangsters, washed them white, and even “heroized” them. Although the BBC finally suffered a shameful failure and the radio station was shut down, the lesson of Hong Kong’s unconsolidated public opinion position is profound.
The BBC
The origin of the BBC is World War I. In October 1915, the British established the War Propaganda Board, which is parallel to the intelligence department and headquartered in Wellington House, known as “Wellington House”.
The “War Propaganda Bureau” has the power to control information, has a strict news censorship system, and can also create any rumors that help combat the enemy.
After World War I, this organization “disappeared”. In fact, it merged with the intelligence agency and became a invisible organization.
Later, this practice was common in Anglo Saxon countries. They always said that they had no propaganda organization, only “independent media” such as BBC and CNN.
In 1922, the BBC was officially established. It has two basic functions:
1? Educate people and love Britain.
2? “Explain” the world and strike the enemy.
After 100 years of development, the BBC has 23,000 regular employees, and the number of non staff members cannot be counted. This is a super propaganda machine. The “Ministry of Truth” in George Orwell’s novel “1984” bears the shadow of the BBC.
To make rumors is to produce weapons for the BBC. It focuses not on social morality, but on the effect of public opinion.
Before and after Putin took office as President, the BBC kept instilling a message to the audience that Russia was committing genocide in Chechnya. Over time, once people saw the information about Chechnya, they would think of “genocide” in a reflexive way, even if they were half convinced.
In this way, the goal of increasing the cost of Russia’s governance of Chechnya has been achieved.
In the Iraq War in 2003, the BBC linked Iraq with weapons of mass destruction through innumerable rumors, clearing the public opinion resistance for the United States and Britain to attack Iraq.
After the event, people can see that American and British politicians apologize for the “detergent” lie, but you won’t see the BBC apologizing because the archway of “the most trusted media in the world” cannot be collapsed.
How many rumors did the BBC create during Ukraine’s “Orange Revolution” in 2014? How many times has President Yanukovich said that there is a golden toilet in his home? It was not until the collapse of Yanukovich that people knew that the golden toilet was a playground facility, but the BBC mission was completed.
In 2019, the BBC paid special attention to Hong Kong, constantly using words such as “Beijing”, “Hong Kong” and “China”, and unconsciously deconstructing “one China”. The titles are very sophisticated, such as “Did Beijing Win?” Did Hong Kong win, The Hong Kong police were demonized. Is it a coincidence that the British government is busy “taking in” Hong Kong drug addicts?
During the epidemic, the British epidemic prevention went out of control. What was the BBC busy with? Over the past three years, we have been making endless rumors to distort and vilify China’s anti epidemic efforts.
But the BBC has an insurmountable political red line.
For example, they should not broadcast any program that might arouse the audience’s sympathy for the Northern Ireland Republican Army;
During the Falklands War, programs favorable to Argentina cannot be broadcast;
During the Russian Ukrainian conflict, no positive news beneficial to Russia shall be broadcast.
When thousands of people in London, Manchester, Liverpool, Glasgow, Edinburgh, Swansea, Belfast and other cities took to the streets to protest against the “energy crisis”, the BBC turned a deaf ear and the “British Communist Youth League” demonstration was “disappeared”.
The BBC has taken great care of China, which is 18000 miles away, but it is still an old recipe, old craftsmanship and old taste — porcelain touching, rumor making and perjury!
We can see the background of “freedom of the press” in the West from the BBC, because Britain is the ancestor of these media. To see this clearly is the beginning of independent thinking on western “independent media”.
The BBC always dresses itself up as an objective and fair media and a white lotus flower. What’s wrong with a shitty stick?
Advise the BBC to pay more attention to the UK, stop littering the world with public opinion rubbish, and attack China with rumors, just like using drugs to satisfy itself, which can only be self destructive in the end.
For nearly a hundred years, the western media have had the absolute majority of the right to speak in the world. Speaking black means speaking black, and speaking white means speaking white. Especially the English language media manipulated by Anglo Saxons bear the brunt.
It is a long process to fight for the global voice, but we must first consolidate our own positions of public opinion.
It is beyond our reach to deal with the source of the rumors about BBC production, but at least we should block the sewage pipe and let the BBC sewage flow back to the UK for production and digestion.
No matter how terrible the rumors made by the BBC are, one thing is certain, the British must have done it!
Have they done little in terms of “genocide”, “forced labour” and “biological and chemical weapons”?
From the era of broadcasting to the era of television, to the era of satellite, to the era of network, the double label face of the BBC will never change.
What is the BBC’s “freedom of the press”? There is only freedom to love Britain and America, as well as freedom to “hate China”.
For Chinese people, BCC is a knife that can kill people without seeing their blood at some time. When their reporters hide their identities, they do not work in human affairs. We must see this clearly.
If the BBC feels that it cannot stay in China, it can go to Glasgow to support Scotland’s independence.