Original: Gu Ziming This article is authorized to be reproduced on WeChat official account: Political Affairs Hall Plus2019
Yesterday, I just talked about how to adjust the epidemic prevention KPI to the satisfaction of the people. Today, when I was coming home, I suddenly became a close contact of mixed positive tubes. After a short restriction of several hours, I just got home to remove the risk.
During the restricted period, when I was eating takeout from hungry people and brushing my mobile phone, I saw an article in the “Zhejiang Propaganda” that “people first” is not “epidemic prevention first”, and proposed that epidemic prevention and control is to prevent viruses, not to prevent people; There has always been “people first”, not the so-called “epidemic prevention first”.
I looked at the article, slapping my thighs and saying “awesome”.
Yes, many times we walk far away, but we forget why we started.
Our epidemic prevention in recent years is not to prove ourselves, but to serve the people.
It is to preserve the fruits of economic development and save millions of lives.
As I do today, as a mixed positive connection, it is only limited to a few hours, and you can also order takeout. Or my classmate has a positive person in his unit today, and hundreds of people are connected to the whole family, so the epidemic prevention is accurate. I believe that we can accept it.
What we can’t accept about epidemic prevention is that some bureaucratic cronies count epidemic business as a bang bang, some incompetent officials will only “seal it”, and some people in power ride on us in your name.
These days, I have been talking with many friends about the epidemic situation, and they generally have a very high expectation of opening up in the short term. But I am pouring cold water on my friends during the call, and the policy change will not be as fast as they expected.
Dynamic zeroing is a difficult road, but the road to openness and coexistence is also difficult. It is not that when we change the road, the problems we need to face will be swept away.
I don’t know which way is better, but I know that no matter which way, we should be fully prepared.
If you are not well prepared physically and mentally, you will have to pay a huge price if you suddenly turn to another road.
The pressure of dynamic reset is mainly borne by the petty bourgeoisie and the middle class. The consequences of openness and coexistence are mainly accepted by the ordinary people at the bottom.
The petty bourgeoisie and the middle class have shouldered the burden for more than two years, accumulated a lot of experience, and have also stored medical supplies. However, most ordinary people are not prepared psychologically and materially to deal with the virus.
From my personal point of view, I hope to open up one day, but I think, even if it is open, we should also put ourselves in the position of other compatriots.
We can’t accept the bureaucratic nepotism that counts the epidemic prevention business as a bang bang, we can’t accept the incompetent officials “sealed it”, and we can’t accept the people in power riding on us in the name of epidemic prevention.
Similarly, we should not bang open businesses (medical vaccines, etc.), conduct reckless “opening” before the popularization of vaccines and medical equipment, and plunder and annex the wealth of the bottom people in the name of openness, taking advantage of the impact of the epidemic.
Confucius said, do not do to others what you do not want.
Don’t go too far, but forget why we started.